Former Reagan administration official Alan Keyes has taken up a
second career – losing political elections. The Maryland resident’s
announcement on Sunday that he will accept the Republican Party’s
invitation to run against Democratic Senate nominee Barack Obama in
Illinois is bound to keep his record intact as a serial loser. It also keeps his record intact as a hypocrite. In
a March 17, 2000 appearance on FOX News’ “Special Report with Brit
Hume,” Keyes said: “And I deeply resent the destruction of federalism
represented by Hillary Clinton’s willingness to go into a state she
doesn’t even live in and pretend to represent people there. So I
certainly wouldn’t imitate it.” But that’s exactly what he is now doing. Keyes
is seeking to represent Illinois, a state in which he has never lived.
Candidates for office have until Nov. 2, Election Day, to establish
residency in the state. By saying one thing and doing another,
Keyes joins many of his Republican brethren in the unofficial Hall of
Shame. Exhibit #1 is Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who was
admitted to Yale University’s Law School under an affirmative action
program, according to the dean. Yet, he opposed the concept once he had
obtained his law degree and moved to the workplace. Ward
Connerly personally benefited from a special California program for
women and people of color. Later, he led state and national campaigns
to outlaw affirmative action. Even George W. Bush, who received extra
points under a legacy program because his father and grandfather had
graduated from Yale University, now says such programs are unfair and
should be eliminated. Interestingly, Keyes and his Black
conservative compatriots have a habit of expressing a strong preference
for a race-neutral society. Of course, it lasts until they feel a need
to exploit their race for personal gain. Take the case of Keyes,
who served as an assistant secretary of state and an ambassador to the
United Nations in the Reagan administration. He ran unsuccessfully for
the U.S. Senate from Maryland in 1988, capturing 38.2 percent of the
vote. He ran again in 1992, slipping to 29 percent against Barbara
Mukulski. Disappointed that the GOP didn’t go all-out to support
him, Keyes did what he had accused others of doing – he played the race
card. Actually, it was more like the whole deck. According to the
Washington Post, Keyes accused GOP leaders of “basically sending the
message that beyond a certain level blacks need not apply.” He added,
“If I can work out in the fields, I think I ought to be allowed to come
into the house for dinner.” I’ll resist the temptation to point out
that Keyes was already a House Negro. Keyes received unfavorable publicity over his practice of paying himself a hefty salary out of campaign funds. In
1996 and 2000, he launched long-shot presidential bids for the White
House. He plunged deeply into debt and still owes $524,169 from his two
presidential runs, according to federal election records. He gets
to be the Republican nominee against State Sen. Obama because other
well-known public figures rejected the overture to run. GOP Sen. Peter
Fitzgerald is retiring and the leading Republican to replace him, Jack
Ryan, was forced to withdraw after embarrassing sex-related disclosures
from his divorce proceedings were unsealed. Former GOP governors
Jim Edgar and James Thompson and former Chicago Bears football coach
were approached, but opted not to run against Obama. Considering
Obama’s mixed-raced background, his centrist views, his loose ties to
the Civil Rights Establishment and commanding lead in the polls, some
are surprised that Keyes is taking on a rising star in the Democratic
Party. Keyes was recruited to run against Obama, in part, because he’s Black. The candidate who has asked to be judged by the content of his character is being judged by the pigmentation of his skin. After losing in 1996, Keyes expressed disappointment that many Christians voted against him. “This
must be a terrible feeling,” he said at the time. “You make a decision
based on expediency, and it doesn’t work out. And then you’re left
without expediency and without principle. With nothing. This is sad, I
never want to wake up the day after an election or any time else with
that emptiness in me, knowing I have given away things that matter the
most for the sake of what I thought would win and finding that, I have
lost and have nothing.” Keyes just might find himself in that position on Nov. 3.
Next Column:
Many Faces of War
Back To Columns |