Bill Clinton’s disgraceful behavior on the presidential campaign has
prompted a long overdue re-examination of his record, a record that
better qualifies him to be called, in the words of one critic, the Pimp
Daddy Prez, not the first Black president. Toni Morrison started
this nonsense. She wrote an article 10 years ago in the New Yorker
magazine saying, “White skin notwithstanding, this is our first black
president. Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be
elected in our children’s lifetime. After all, Clinton displays almost
every trope of blackness: single-parent household, born poor,
working-class, saxophone-playing, McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy
from Arkansas.” The Congressional Black Caucus compounded the
problem in 2001 while honoring Clinton at a dinner. Then-CBC Chair
Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas said at the time that Clinton “took so
many initiatives he made us think for a while we had elected the first
Black president.” As governor of Arkansas, Clinton did not remove
the rebel flag from the state house nor sign Martin Luther King
legislation into law. To prove that he could be tough while campaigning
for president, he went to a Jesse Jackson forum to criticize rapper
Sister Souljah for an outlandish comment she had made about killing
Whites. Just before the New Hampshire election, he supported the
execution of Ricky Ray Rector, a brain-damaged African-American. As
president, Clinton signed a regressive welfare reform program into law.
He dropped the ball on Rwanda. His “mend it but don’t end it” approach
to affirmative action was not ideal, but may have been the strongest he
could have managed with Republicans in control of Congress. He
abandoned Harvard Law Professor Lani Guinier after picking her to head
the civil rights division of the Justice Department. Still, Black
people loved him and with such unquestioned loyalty, the Clintons were
confident that Hillary would stroll to an easy primary victory in South
Carolina, where Blacks made up half of the Democratic electorate. Insulted
by the Clintons’ tag-team attacks on Obama, nearly 80 percent of
African-Americans in South Carolina sent Hillary and Bill packing. The
Clinton camp had hoped to gain points by arguing that Hillary is more
electable than Obama. But a CNN poll put that myth to rest. The poll,
released shortly after observance of Dr. Martin Luther King Holiday,
shows that America is more ready to elect a Black president than a
female one. In the survey, 72 percent of Whites and 61 percent of
Blacks believe the country is ready for an African-American president.
However, only 63 percent of both Whites and Blacks say the country is
ready for a female president. Another myth being floated by the
Clinton camp is that Latinos won’t support a Black candidate. While
Hispanics were more supportive of Clinton than Obama in Nevada, the
Black-Brown divide is not as wide as political handlers would want you
to believe. University of Washington political scientist Matt
Barreto has compiled research showing that Harold Washington received
80 percent of the Latino vote when he was elected mayor of Chicago in
1983. Similarly, David Dinkins won 73 percent in New York in 1989,
Denver’s Wellington Webb received 70 percent in 1991 and Ron Kirk also
got 70 percent of the Latino vote in Dallas in 1995, 1997 and 1999. The question is no longer whether Obama is electable, but whether Hillary Clinton is the Democrats’ strongest candidate. The
Nation magazine compiled figures showing that in Iowa, 71 percent of
caucus-goers voted for someone other than Hillary Clinton. In New
Hampshire, 61 percent voted ABC – Anybody but Clinton. Almost half of
those participating in the Nevada caucuses – 49 percent – voted for
Clinton’s opponents. In Michigan, where Clinton was virtually
unopposed, she lost 45 percent of the vote. And in South Carolina, 83
percent of the voters supported Clinton’s opponents. When you look at the Black vote, which is the most loyal bloc in the party, Hillary Clinton’s showing is even more unimpressive. In
Michigan, where the Democratic Party asked presidential candidates not
to compete because the state moved up its contest over the objection of
party officials, 69 percent of African-Americans voted for an
uncommitted slate rather than vote for Clinton. In South Carolina,
where Bill Clinton was used extensively, 80 percent of
African-Americans rejected Hillary Clinton. Even Toni Morrison
has now endorsed Obama, saying, “There have been a few prescient
leaders in our past, but you are the man for this time.” Former
Clinton adviser Dick Morris speculates that the Clinton attack on Obama
in South Carolina was a ploy to deliberately inject race into the
contest, hoping it will create a White backlash against Obama on Feb.
5, when voters go the polls in 22 states. If true, that’s as bad as any Republican dirty trick. Blacks are tired of being pimped.
Next Column:
Now's Time to Focus on Dr. King and his Nightmare
Back To Columns |