When I was covering Jesse Jackson’s 1984 presidential campaign for
the Chicago Tribune, I noticed that nothing energized African-American
crowds like the sight of Jackson and Minister Louis Farrakhan joined in
unity. There was Farrakhan, the disciple of a separatist, Elijah
Muhammad, and Jackson, the protégée of an integrationist, Dr. Martin
Luther King Jr. Yet, here they were together—the Muslim leader
from the North and self-styled “Country Preacher” from the
South—exhorting African-Americans to support Jackson’s long-shot
candidacy and traveling to the Middle East to obtain the release of Lt.
Robert Goodman, the Navy bomber pilot who had been shot down while
flying over Syria. If Farrakhan and Jackson could get along, it was
thought, the prospect of Black unity was within our grasp. Of
course, that partnership was short-lived. Despite having told his
campaign staff that he would never repudiate Minister Farrakhan,
Jackson, did just that. Jackson cut his tie with the Nation of
Islam leader after Farrakhan described the creation of Israel as “an
outlaw act.” A reporter quoted Farrakhan as saying that Israel “will
never have any peace structured on injustice, lying and deceit and
using the name of God to shield your gutter [he actually said dirty]
religion under His holy and righteous name.” Jackson, in the
middle of a trip to free Cuban political prisoners, called Farrakhan’s
comments “reprehensible and morally indefensible.” And things
have never been the same. Farrakhan told me that not only did Jackson
distance him on the political front, but when the two appeared in
public, Jackson would make sure he would be on the opposite side of the
stage to make sure that the two of them would not be photographed
together. With tensions boiling in the Middle East, the two
leaders, both of whom have met privately with Yasser Arafat, are taking
different approaches to helping bring about peace in that region. Jackson,
in a recent column syndicated by the National Newspaper Publishers
Association News Service, wrote “An Open Letter to Yasser Arafat.” He
urged the PLO leader “to call not simply for the end to the terrorist
bombings, but for a new commitment to nonviolence as a means to achieve
Palestinian statehood.” Jackson wrote, “Nonviolent resistance
recognizes the humanity of your opponents. It challenges their moral
sensibility, not their military capacity. It forces them to recognize
your humanity. And because it demonstrates your discipline, your
commitment, your love of life—it lays the basis for co-existence rather
than co-annihilation.” At a press conference on April 2, the
Nation of Islam leader dispensed with Jackson’s “We Shall Overcome”
rhetoric of the 1960s and put the onus directly on Israel and its
primary benefactor, the United States. “In the recent Arab League
Summit, which he [Arafat] should have been able to attend, he could not
attend without Israeli permission,” Farrakhan noted. “You’ve reduced
him. Not only in the eyes of the American people and other
administrations of governments, you have done the worst thing of all;
you have reduced him in the eyes of his own people.” Farrakhan seeks a different approach. “If
America wants to get Mr. Arafat to stop the so-called suicide bombings,
America must encourage Israel to give him something to use as leverage
to reign in the more extreme elements of his own people,” Farrakhan
suggested. “You give him nothing but demand of him everything. “What
can you give him? You could say to him, ‘Chairman Arafat, we will stop
all building of settlements on the West Bank. We will stop bulldozing
Palestinian homes, assassinating Palestinian leaders and confiscating
Palestinian land.” Unlike Jackson, Farrakhan also observed how each side is portrayed in the media. “Those
that throw stones at tanks, those that use AK47s are not even called
Palestinian defenders. They are called gunmen by the American media.
Those men and women and children that are strapping themselves with
bombs are called terrorists. Yet, the 70,000 people that live in
Ramallah, are they terrified to see tanks, to see helicopter gun ships,
to see F16s? Of course, they are. But this is called (Israeli)
self-defense while a whole lot of people (Palestinians) are being
terrorized.” On the campaign trail, Jackson liked to remind
crowds that when everyone else was talking about freeing Lt. Goodman,
“I went and got him.” Now, it is Farrakhan who doing the
traveling, with scheduled visits to Africa and the Middle East. And
while the Nation of Islam leader travels abroad, Jesse Jackson has been
left behind talking, using language more suited for past civil rights
battles than the war that is now at Arafat’s doorstep.
Next Column:
Preparing Now for Fall Elections
Back To Columns |