After stumbling miserably out of the gate, George W. Bush has
finally caught up with the American public and now realizes that there
is widespread support for rebuilding New Orleans. He has finally struck
the right rhetorical chords, pledging to “renew our promise as a land
of equality and decency.” He went on to say, “As we clear away the
debris of a hurricane, let us also clear away the legacy of inequality.” With
Bush, it is always better to ignore the language and examine his
record. He has made some sweeping endorsements of diversity that would
have made even Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. proud. But he used Dr. King’s
birthday to announce his opposition to a pair of University of Michigan
affirmative action cases that went before the Supreme Court. Over
Bush’s objection, the conservative court upheld Michigan’s law school
admissions program while invalidating a more numbers-oriented
undergraduate plan. There are already troubling signs that the
Bush administration plans to use this natural disaster to recycle some
old Bush plans that were previously rejected. All of the water hadn’t
been drained from Canal Street in New Orleans before Bush proposed
$5,000 “Worker Recovery Accounts” to assist victims of Hurricane
Katrina and the subsequent flooding. Under the plan, those left
unemployed by Katrina can use the one-time grant for job training, day
care, transportation, education or anything else that will help them
land a job. The administration proposed a similar program two
years ago, but Congress rejected the $3.6 billion plan. If a person
found a job within 13 weeks, under the plan he or she could keep up to
$1,000 left in the account. Liberals opposed the plan because they
thought it would be the first step in replacing unemployment insurance.
Conservatives, on the other hand, objected because they did not want to
create another layer of bureaucracy. Even more disturbing is Bush’s determination to use public funds to subsidize private education. The
Department of Education announced a proposal that would provide nearly
$500 million in federal funding to help students enrolled in private
schools in the disaster area relocate to private schools elsewhere.
This is a variation of Bush’s voucher plan and would use limited public
funds to subsidize private education. The flawed plan calls for each
student receiving up to $7,500. Some conservatives, fearing
growing deficits and an uncomfortable federal role in the relief
efforts, are calling for across-the-board cuts in order to fund the
recovery and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Others are challenging
Congress to remove pork projects from recently enacted legislation. Bush says he has no plans to raise taxes or do away with previously enacted tax cuts that mostly benefit the wealthy. Former
President Bill Clinton, in an interview on the Today Show, said it
would be “crazy” to maintain those tax cuts in view of the unexpected
new expenses. Clinton and former president George H.W. Bush are heading
up private relief efforts to help the victims of Katrina. Expenses
associated with recovering from Hurricane Katrina, estimated to be $150
to $200 billion, should not be used to distort the serious deficit
problems the nation was facing before the disaster. The Congressional
Budget Office had projected that the federal deficit would exceed $300
billion a year for the next decade, totaling nearly $4.5 trillion by
2015. And that was long before Katrina came ashore. An analysis
by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities shows that the repeal of
some of the previously enacted tax cuts would more than offset expenses
associated with Hurricane Katrina. “The tax cuts enacted in 2001
and 2003 cost more each year than the total amount likely to be spent
on Katrina,” the center said. “The cost of tax cuts enacted in 2001 and
2003 is $225 billion this year alone and will climb to higher levels
each year in the future, as more of the tax cuts enacted in 2001 take
full effect…The cost of the tax cuts in a single year exceeds the total
anticipated costs of all expenses related to the hurricane over the
years to come.” Rather than making the “bold” decision that he
promised by repealing at least one of the tax cuts, George W. Bush will
inflict even more cuts in programs designed to help the very people
displaced by Hurricane Katrina. Bush’s words may sound like fellow
Texan Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society Programs, but they are not
matched by similar action.
Next Column:
New Orleans: What Went Wrong?
Back To Columns |