|
©
2011 by George E. Curry. All rights reserved.
ABIDJAN, Côte d’Ivoire -- Laurent Gbagbo, the embattled
president of Côte d’Ivoire, more popularly known as the Ivory Coast, says
President Barack Obama, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and other western
leaders should stop questioning the legitimacy of his re-election and accord
the West African country the same respect the United States was given in the
controversial 2000 presidential election contest between Al Gore and George W.
Bush.
In
an exclusive videotaped interview in his presidential residence, Gbagbo said:
“You in the United States, in 2000, you had an election dispute between Al Gore
and George W. Bush. They did a recount of the votes. Did we go get the NATO
forces to come and attack America and impose democracy on America? This is a
post-electoral dispute. That’s why I’m [suspicious of] all those countries who
are rushing in to condemn us. I don’t trust them.”
In
three separate rulings, the U.S. Supreme Court halted the recounting of ballots
in the race between Bush and Gore, allowing Florida Secretary of State Katherine
Harris’ certification of Bush as the winner to stand. Bush’s victory in Florida
gave him 25 electoral votes, allowing him to defeat Gore 271 electoral votes to
266.
On
October 31, there was a presidential election in Côte d’Ivoire. A run-off
election was held November 28 between Gbagbo and Alassane Ouattara, a former
prime minister under President Felix Houphouet-Boigny and an economist for the
International Monetary Fund. The chairman of the Independent Electoral
Commission (IEC) announced that Ouattara was the victor, which pleased Sarkozy
and other western leaders who had been supporting Ouattara.
Gbagbo,
who was first elected president of the former French colony a decade ago, said
those supporting Ouattara ignored the second part of a two-step electoral
process. After some of the ballots were challenged by Gbagbo, the
Constitutional Council – the equivalent of the U.S. Supreme Court – ruled that
Gbagbo won the run-off with 51.45 percent of the votes, three percentage points
higher than Ouattara’s 48.55 percent.
“In
our constitution, the Independent Electoral Commission is just an
administrative body. It organizes the election and it proclaims the provisional
results,” Gbagbo explained. “The only institution which by law proclaims the
final results, proclaim who won the election and who receives the oath of
president is the Constitutional Council.”
Sarkozy
expressed support for Ouattara before the Constitutional Council issued its
ruling.
“The
Independent Electoral Commission has announced the results, which signal a
clear, indisputable victory for Alassane Ouattara,” Sarkozy said on December 4.
“After verification of the votes, the United Nations Secretary-General Mr. Ban
Ki-moon endorsed the result of the ballot and congratulated President-elect M.
Ouattara. Following this, President Obama and the European leaders, like me,
saluted Alassane Ouattara’s victory.”
Sarkozy
was relying on a 2007 peace agreement that required the United Nations to
certify election results. However, Gbagbo asserted that as a sovereign nation,
no outside institution is above his country’s highest court.
After
throwing out voided ballots, the Constitutional Council concluded that Gbagbo
had defeated Ouattara 2,054,537 to 1,938,672.
The
Constitutional Council is composed of six counselors and a president. Under the
constitution, the president of the National Assembly appoints three of the
jurists and the president of the country picks three, plus the president of the
Constitutional Council.
Critics
argue that given its makeup, it is not surprising that Council ruled in Gbagbo’s
favor. Gbagbo does not deny that most of the justices are his friends, but said
that is no different from the president of the United States appointing members
of the Supreme Court, pending Senate confirmation.
Gbagbo
also noted that the Independent Electoral Commission was heavily packed with
Ouattara supporters, a point mentioned in some of the Constitutional Council’s
documents.
In
a signed appeal to voters, dated November 27, 2010, Gbagbo and Ouattara agreed,
“We solemnly pledge to accept the election results as declared at the close of
polls by the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) and the Constitutional
Council.”
Article
98 of the constitution proclaims, “The decisions of the Constitutional Council
are not susceptible to any recourse…”
Instead
of accepting the ruling by the country’s top court, however, Ouattara claimed
victory and called for the physical removal of Gbagbo from Côte d’Ivoire. He
remains ensconced in the Golf Hotel, protected by United Nations troops. The
only way to reach or leave the hotel is aboard a UN helicopter.
Côte
d’Ivoire, once known as the Paris of Africa, is the world’s largest producer of
cocoa. Its downtown skyline is dotted with impressive skyscrapers. The country
is slightly larger than New Mexico and has a population of approximately 21
million.
Ethnic,
geographical and religious factors are part of the tension between supporters
of each candidate. Gbagbo is a Christian from the Bete ethnic group and lives
in the south. Ouattara is a Muslim, a member of the Dioula group, whose
supporters are mostly in the northern part of the country, a section held by
rebels who initiated a civil war less than two years after Gbagbo became
president.
Gbagbo
said he was under pressure to hold elections in 2010 even though the
international community that now opposes him never insisted that rebels lay
down their guns as part of the peace process.
“Many
Americans don’t even know what is Côte d’Ivoire,” said Gbagbo. “When I was in
the U.S., I was obliged to say we are between Ghana and Liberia… So when they
tell them there’s a dictator somewhere in a country called Côte d’Ivoire who
lost the election and doesn’t want to go, they take it. It’s very easy when it
concerns Africa because they say, ‘Well, it’s Africa.’”
Gbagbo,
a former college professor, has a Ph.D in history and wrote his dissertation on
French colonization of Africa. He said many of the problems on the continent
stem from the relationship between African leaders and their old colonial
powers.
That
alone, however, does not explain why there is such widespread opposition to
Gbagbo. The United Nations, France, the U.S., the African Union, the Central
Bank of West African States and the 15-member Economic Community of West African
States (ECOWAS) all assert that Ouattara is the duly elected president.
When
asked about African opposition to his remaining in power, the prideful
Pan-Africanist became subdued, selecting his words carefully.
“English-speaking
countries that were colonized by Great Britain do not suffer the pressure from
their colonial power as former French colonies,” Gbagbo stated. “The French
have a stronger impact on its former colonies than English-speaking
superpowers. That’s a factual situation. Other than that, our French-speaking
countries are more fragile than English-speaking countries.”
In
other words, some African leaders feel intense economic pressure to do the
bidding of France.
Not
everyone accepts that explanation.
Abbul-Rahma,
writing in a column for GhanaWeb.com, said: “…The Ivorian problem is not an
issue of colonial imperialism, but a determined effort by a tyrant to defy the
will of his people and of the international community.”
Some
critics are trying to use the situation in Côte d’Ivoire and other troubled
Black countries as an excuse to reintroduce colonialism.
In
his January 11 column in the Wall Street
Journal, Bret Stephens dismissed Côte d’Ivoire, Haiti and the Sudan as
basket cases.
“What,
if anything, does it all mean? It means that we have come full circle,” said
Stephens, deputy editorial page editor of the newspaper. “It means that
colonialism, for which the West has spent the past five decades in nonstop
atonement, was far from the worst thing to befall much of the colonized world.
It means, also, that some new version of colonialism may be the best thing that
could happen to at least some of the countries in the post-colonial world.”
Ouattara
called for a “special operations” raid to seize Gbagbo and “take him somewhere
else.” With France cheering them on, African leaders in ECOWAS have discussed
the possibility of using military troops to remove Gbagbo from office.
Ghana
President John Mills, a member of ECOWAS, said he will have no part of such a
move. And one of Mills’ predecessors, Jerry Rawlings, supports his decision.
“More
outrageous election results have taken place without intervention,” Rawlings stated.”How can we justify an intervention in this instance, when
the results are so close and divided along ethnic lines? Let us investigate all
the peaceful options available rather than a military intervention that cannot
establish a peaceful political transition in
Côte d’Ivoire.”
President
Obama is part of the international effort to isolate Gbagbo.
Like
the European Union, he has announced a travel ban on Gbagbo, his wife and three
of his top aides. In addition, an executive order issued by Obama forbids U.S.
citizens from conducting financial or commercial transactions with Gbagbo and
his inner circle and freezes all of their U.S. assets.
“They
said they are closing all of the accounts of President Gbagbo and his staff in
the foreign banks, but I laughed at it,” Gbagbo said, flashing a broad smile.
“I have no accounts outside [Côte d’Ivoire].
In the United States, they found a small account that’s for my daughter
when she was a student there. There’s $400 in the account. She forgot that
there was $400 left in it. That’s the only account that is called Gbagbo and
they don’t even belong to me. They are not for me, they belong to my daughter.”
According
to the White House, Obama has tried to reach Gbagbo by telephone on at least
three occasions, but the African leader would not accept his calls.
When
asked about refusing to speak with U.S. president, Gbagbo said, “I didn’t even
know if Barack Obama called me because his ambassador, he has discredited
himself. So, when he tells me something, I don’t believe him.”
That
notwithstanding, Obama sent a letter to Gbagbo urging him to step aside.
According to Gbagbo, Obama said “he’d give me a professor’s job in Boston.”
Despite
his ability to see humor in some U.S. actions, it is clear that Gbagbo is
pained about the actions of America’s first Black president, a president whose
father was born in Kenya.
When
this interviewer asked Gbagbo what he would say if Barack Obama were sitting
across from him, Gbagbo replied: “If I was in front of him, I would say his
administration is being misled, that his administration is being totally misled
on this issue,” Gbagbo said. “He has to help Africans build strong states and
to build those strong states, you have to re-enforce the power of the
institutions on which the nations stand. He must respect those institutions.”
Gbagbo
said Obama is more than simply a Black man in the White House.
“I’m
very proud that when the Blacks now walk down the streets in America, they are
not looked down upon like a sub-human,” Gbagbo explained. “This is my pride.
But politics remain politics… He is an American
president. And he defends the interests of the United States.”
Meanwhile,
as talk continues about a possible military invasion to forcibly dislodge
Gbagbo from power and a parade of African leaders continue visiting him in
Abidjan almost on a weekly basis in an attempt to get him to step down, Gbagbo
is trying to defend his interests.
At
present, two men claim to be president of one country. Gbagbo’s proposal to
share leadership was quickly rejected by his opponent. He has since proposed
that all of the ballots be recounted – even the dismissed ones that he says
were tainted – and have the person with the most votes declared the winner.
That offer has also been rejected.
“When
I say come so that we can recount the votes, we can examine and go over the
minutes of the polling stations, the UN, France, European Union, U.S.A., they
refuse,” Gbagbo stated. “But the truth is there in those documents. Why don’t
they want this to happen? Because for a long time, they’ve wanted this man to
become president. They think I’m the one blocking them.”
###
Next Column:
Ronald Reagan: A Better Friend of Blacks than Obama?
Back To Columns |