The Republican Party, after receiving only 8 percent of the
African-American vote in the 2000 presidential election, has
established a goal of winning 25 percent of the Black vote in next
year’s contest. Instead of making that announcement when most people
were preparing to make their New Year’s resolutions, the GOP should
have delayed that announcement for three months. Then, it would be
clear that this was some sort of April Fool’s joke. What has George Bush done to quadruple his Black support? Let’s ignore the rhetoric and look at the record. First,
Bush pledged during his 2000 campaign that he would govern as a
compassionate conservative. As has been observed, he has been
compassionate toward conservatives. For example, most of his tax cuts
benefited the wealthy, the majority of whom vote Republican. Meanwhile,
Bush did not seek to fully fund his No Child Left Behind education law,
he has proposed changes in programs such as Head Start that will be
detrimental to Black children, and the president has no significant
domestic policy that will uplift African-Americans. Bush had a
chance to show some compassion by supporting affirmative action in a
pair of University of Michigan cases that came before the Supreme Court
in 2003. Instead, Bush ordered his solicitor general to oppose the
cases and had the insensitivity to announce his decision on Dr. Martin
Luther King’s birthday. That’s a strange way of showing compassion. A
conservative Supreme Court – with seven of its nine members appointed
by Republican presidents – upheld the concept of affirmative action in
the case involving the University of Michigan’s Law School. And true to
form, Bush praised the virtues of diversity after the ruling while
neglecting to point out that his position would have made that goal
more difficult to achieve. In a move that will make courts of the
future more likely to reflect his politics, Bush has packed the federal
courts with Right-wing judges. One of them, Janice Rogers Brown, is so
far out of the mainstream that she is a frequent dissenter on the
Republican-controlled California Supreme Court. Bush wants to elevate
her to a seat on the U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia. The Black conservative is so extreme that the White chief
judge in California, also a Republican, says she minimizes the harm of
racial discrimination in order to make political points. Bush
has displayed his disdain for Black America by meeting only once with
members of the Congressional Black Caucus, despite repeated requests
for meetings. Like them or not, Black members of Congress were fairly
elected by voters – and that’s more than we can say about Bush. When
Bush thumbs his nose at them, he thumbs his nose at all
African-Americans. By disrespecting authentic Black leaders, Bush
seems to be subscribing to thinking of Newt Gingrich, the former House
speaker. In 1983, Gingrich said, “It is in the interest of the
Republican Party and Ronald Reagan to invent new Black leaders, so to
speak…” The GOP has “invented” several Black front organizations
that they are propping up with money. But money can’t buy credibility
and these groups that oppose affirmative action and favor school
vouchers have little, if any, influence on African-American thought. In
one sense, Bush’s problem is a GOP problem. Republicans have
established a clear record of hostility toward the interests of
African-Americans, yet they want to dupe us into believing that they
are our friends. That’s an insult to our intelligence. One of the
best barometers of legislative support for issues important to Black
America is the NAACP’s annual report card on civil rights. Year after
year, it is difficult to find Republicans in the House or Senate who
earn a C-grade or higher on civil rights. Most earn Ds and Fs. But
Bush and the GOP don’t want us to get confused by the facts. So they
are targeting young Black voters they feel are more likely to be
receptive to their message, they are planning a barrage of commercials
on Black radio, ads in Black newspapers and parading their Black
Cabinet members before us – all of whom except Colin Powell opposed the
University of Michigan affirmative action programs – to say why we
should vote for George Bush in 2004. It won’t work. George Bush
began his administration by putting on a minstrel show in Philadelphia.
He should realize that no amount of buck dancing by Black entertainers
or trying to replace legitimate Black leaders with his hand-picked
Black appointees will blind African-Americans to his sorry record on
civil rights.
Next Column:
New Poll Reveals Depth of White Racism
Back To Columns |