As the U.S. begins Year 4 of its occupation of Iraq, the media
cannot look at its behavior over the past three years and declare
victory. In fact, when it comes to telling the truth, many journalists
and commentators have surrendered without putting up a fight. A
compilation of the media’s greatest hits – or, biggest flops – has been
assembled by the watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting and
can be found online at www.fair.org. From the outset of the war, the
public’s watchdogs have been serving as the Bush administration’s
lapdogs. Fox News Channel Brit Hume is one of Bush’s leading cheerleaders “The
majority of the American media who were in a position to comment upon
the progress of the war in the early going, and even after that, we got
it wrong,” Humes said in a speech in Richmond, Va. “They didn’t get it
just a little wrong. They got it completely wrong.” [Richmond Times
Dispatch 4/25/04] Fellow conservative Charles Krauthammer, a columnist for the Washington Post, sounds a similar alarm. “The
only people who think this wasn’t a victory are Upper Westside
liberals, and a few people here in Washington.” [Inside Washington
4/19/03] One of the newspapers read by Upper Westside liberals in
New York was not to be outdone by its Washington competitor. Times
reporter David Carr said: “Liberal writers for ideologically driven
magazines like The Nation and less overtly political ones like The New
Yorker did not predict a defeat, but the terrible consequences many
warned of have not happened. Now liberal commentators must address the
victory at hand and confront an ascendant conservative juggernaut that
asserts United States might can set the world right.” [4/16/03] Fox’s
News Bill O’Reilly boasted, “It won’t take weeks. You know that,
professor. Our military machine will crush Iraq in a matter of days and
there’s no question that it will.” [2/10/03] Another Fox commentator, Morton Kondracke, did not attempt to restrain his glee. “Well,
the hot story of the week is victory,” he said. “…The Tommy Franks-Don
Rumsfeld battle plan, war plan, worked brilliantly, a three-week war
with mercifully few American deaths or Iraqi civilian deaths…There is a
lot of work yet to do, but all the naysayers have been humiliated so
far…The final word on this is hooray.” [4/12/03] A Los Angeles Times headline that proclaimed, “Iraq is All but Won; Now What?” [4/10/03] CBS
News reporter Joie Chen declared, “Now that the combat phase of the war
in Iraq is officially over, what begins is a debate throughout the
entire U.S. government over America’s unrivaled power and how best to
use it.” [5/4/03] Along with cheering U.S. troops entering Iraq –
maybe Rumsfeld confused U.S. journalists/commentators with Iraqi
citizens he had predicted would waving U.S. flags as they were being
“liberated” – they sounded like Bush minions on the issue of weapons of
mass destruction. “Over the next couple of weeks when we find
chemical weapons this guy was amassing, the fact that this war was
attacked by the left and so the right was so vindicated, I think, really
means that the left is going to have to hang its head for three or four
more years,” said Dick Morris on Fox News. [4/9/03) “Saddam could
decide to take Baghdad with him,” Newsweek said. “One Arab intelligence
officer interviewed by Newsweek spoke of ‘the green mushroom’ over
Baghdad…” [3/17/03] MSNBC Reporter Bob Arnot: “…More than
anything else, real vindication for the administration. One, credible
evidence of weapons of mass destruction. Two, you know what? There were
a lot of terrorists here, really bad guys. I saw them.” [4/9/03] Syndicated columnist Cal Thomas set himself up for a future ridicule. “Speaking
to the U.N. Security Council last week, Secretary of State Colin Powell
made so strong a case that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein is in material
breach of U.N. resolutions that only the duped, the dumb and the
desperate could ignore it.” [2/12/03] Okay, Cal, which one are you? Bob
Edwards, on National Public Radio (NPR) at the time, announced:
“Congress returns to Washington this week to a world very different
from the one members left two weeks ago. The war in Iraq is essentially
over and domestic issues are regaining attention.” [4/28/03] In
another column Thomas said: “All of the printed and voiced prophecies
should be saved in an archive. When these false prophets again appear,
they can be reminded of the error of their previous ways and at least
be offered an opportunity to recant and repent. Otherwise, they will
return to us in another situation where their expertise will be
acknowledged, or taken for granted, but their credibility will be
lacking.” As an unrepentant false prophet, Thomas should know.
Next Column:
Discrimination with a Smile
Back To Columns |