|
Forty-five
y ears ago, Texas Western University’s all-Black starting lineup defeated No.
1-ranked University of Kentucky all-White basketball team for the 1966 NCAA
Men’s Basketball Championship. The game, played at the University of Maryland’s
Cole Field House on March 19, 1966, sent major White universities scouring the
country for African-American players, literally changing the face of college
basketball.
Pat
Riley, a member of Adolph Rupp’s losing team and former coach of the Los
Angeles Lakers, was a member of the Kentucky team that lost 72-65. Jerry
Bruckheimer, who made “Glory Road,” a movie about the game, told the El Paso Times: “Pat Riley told me this
great story that Magic Johnson came into his office when he was coach of the
Lakers and said, ‘Had not David Lattin dunked that ball over you, I wouldn’t be
in here [the NBA].’”
Judging
from the controversy created by former University of Michigan and Chicago Bulls
basketball star Jalen Rose, one would be forgiven if he or she thought that
Michigan’s all-freshmen and all-Black “Fab Five” played in the most historic
college games. They didn’t. The team made it to the NCAA finals twice, losing
each time.
The
1991 University of Michigan freshmen basketball players were considered the
greatest class ever recruited. They included Jalen Rose and Chris Webber of
Detroit, Juwan Howard of Chicago and Texas standouts Jimmy King and Ray
Jackson.
In
addition to being talented, they were brash, talked trash and popularized baggy
gym shorts and shaved heads.
But
it was Rose’s comments in a documentary that he produced about the Fab Five
that created a controversy that has gone into overtime.
In
the documentary, Rose said, “For me, Duke was a person. I hated Duke, and I
hated everything Duke stood for. Schools like Duke don’t recruit players like
me. I felt that they only recruited players that were Uncle Toms.”
First,
Rose’s statement isn’t true. Second, even if it were, they were exceptionally
talented Uncle Toms, defeating Michigan all four times the Fab Five faced Duke,
including one national championship game.
To
his credit, Rose later said that was the view he held of Duke at the time, not
today.
Former
Duke star Grant Hill answered Rose in a New
York Times op-ed.
“It
was a sad and somewhat pathetic turn of events, therefore, to see friends
narrating this interesting documentary about their moment in time and calling
me a bitch and worse, calling all black players at Duke ‘Uncle Toms’ and, to
some degree, disparaging my parents for their education, work ethic and
commitment to each other and to me,” said Hill, who now plays for the Phoenix
Suns.
Calvin
Hill, a Yale graduate, had a successful NFL career as a running back for the
Dallas Cowboys. His wife is an attorney.
Rose
said his father was an NBA player who had no role in his life. Largely left out
of the public controversy was the clear impression that Rose hungered for a
family unit that included his father. Without that, however, he played on his
image of a kid who grew up on the rough streets of Chicago.
Michael
Wilbon, who covered both Hill and Rose as a columnist for the Washington Post and now share duties
with Rose as ESPN commentators, knows both men well.
“Trust
me, Grant Hill and Jalen Rose ain’t all that different,” Wilbon wrote. “They’re
a lot more alike than they are dissimilar, even if they did come from different
sides of the tracks. And right now, way too much is being made of the fact that
they did. Calvin Hill, Grant’s father, was no more an ‘Uncle Tom’ for providing
every opportunity and advantage for his kids than Rose would be now for
providing every opportunity and advantage for his. It’s called the American
Dream, and the only real difference here is the Hills grabbed hold of it
a generation before the Roses.”
New York Times columnist
Bill Rhoden, a graduate of Morgan State University in Baltimore, had an
interesting take on the war of words.
“My
view about the Fab Five, then and now, was that these young men had chosen the
right pew but had gone to the wrong church. Seen through the prism of black
power and empowerment, and also from the point of view of one who attended a
black college, the Fab Five had simply made a wealthy white institution
wealthier and had missed a grand
opportunity to catapult a historically black college or university to the
mountaintop of March Madness.”
He continued, “Did Rose have any idea of the
impact they would have had on history had they elected to attend a historically
black college or university? Yes, the stage would have been smaller, television
nonexistent, at first. But the
novelty of their act and then the courage of what they represented would have
attracted attention. The Fab Five would have been the story of March Madness,
not simply a spectacle.”
George E. Curry, former
editor-in-chief of Emerge magazine and the NNPA News Service, is a keynote
speaker, moderator, and media coach. He can be reached through his Web site, www.georgecurry.com
You can also follow him at www.twitter.com/currygeorge.
Next Column:
The U.S. Switches Back and Forth on Gaddafi
Back To Columns |